State v. Hoven

On March 6, 1923, the state’s attorney of Potter county filed an information against the defendant. To1 this information defendant demurred on the following grounds: (1) That it does not substantially conform to the requirements of title 5, Revised Code of 1919;' (2) that the-information does not describe a public offense; (3) that the offense charged is not des-ignated in a manner to enable a person of common'understanding to know what is intended.

Omitting merely formal parts, the information clearly charges that— - ..“On.the 29th,.day- of October, in the year 1922, in the county of-Potter,…