State v. Haapanen
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.
A statute denounces selling intoxicating liquor, makes the overt act a misdemeanor, and confers on municipal and other magistrate courts, jurisdiction to try and punish offenders. R. S., Chap. 127, Sec. 40. On the part of the person convicted, an appeal lies, to meet the constitutional guaranty of trial by jury. R. S., supra ; Con. of Maine, Art. 1, Sec. 6.
In magistrate courts, liquor prosecutions are begun by complaint. R. S., supra. Where criminal prosecutions originate, under a statute, on complaint, one under oath or affirmation is implied. Campbell v. Thompson, 16 Me., 117. On appeal, in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RobertsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- State v. MungerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1843
- State v. LouanisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1907
- State v. HovenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HumeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
- State v. McClaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
- Logan v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- State v. ChildSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962
- State v. SchumacherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.