Legal Opinion
Perrill & Fox v. Runge
Texas Supreme Court
Decided December 4, 1888No. 6283PublishedCited by 22 opinions
Appeal from Hill. Tried below before Hon. J. M. Hall.
1Opinion of the Court
Gaines, Associate Justice.
The appellees brought this suit against appellants on a promissory note executed by them in their firm name, and at the time of the filing of the petition they sued out a writ of attachment. The writ commanded the sheriff to attach “the property of W. M. Perrill and P. F. Fox, composing the firm of Perrill & Fox.”
Before entering upon a trial of the cause appellants presented a motion to quash the attachment, which was overruled by the court. The ruling of the court on the motion was excepted to and is now assigned as error. The ground of the motion was that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Focke v. WatersTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Lewis & Baker v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Schrimpf v. McArdleTexas Supreme Court · 1855
- City National Bank v. FlippenTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Moody & Jamison v. Julius Levy & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by22 opinions
- Gulf Paving Co. v. LofstedtTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Gunst v. PelhamTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Kildare Lumber Co. v. Atlanta BankTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Burge v. Beaumont Carriage CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Spencer v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.