City National Bank v. Flippen
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Bowie. Tried below before the Hon. W. P. McLean. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Willie, Chief Justice.
The appellant sued Flippen upon a promissory note, and prayed for an attachment upon the ground that Flippen had disposed ofTiis property, in whole or in part, for the purpose of defrauding his creditors. The petition was not sworn to, but an affidavit was separately made by the agent of the appellant, which was 'held by the court below to be insufficient to serve as a basis for an attachment. The writ was quashed upon motion, and the ruling of the court in this respect is the only matter complained of in this appeal. The affidavit is claimed to be defective because it…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Evans & Martin v. TuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by7 opinions
- Silberberg v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
- Perrill & Fox v. RungeTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Rayner v. PoseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Ball v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
- Rayner v. PoseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.