Legal Opinion

Gunst v. Pelham

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1889No. 2639PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Appeal from Henderson. Tried below before Hon. F. A. Williams. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.

Appellee Pelham, on the 25th day of August, 1886, sold to one Johnson a tract of land and certain live stock, consisting of horses, cattle, and hogs, for which Johnson paid in cash $368, and executed his six promissory notes amounting in the aggregate to the sum of $5500, and at the same time bound himself to pay a note executed by Pelham to Murchison & Coleman for the sum of $1050, which was secured by a mortgage upon' the land. The consideration was recited in the deed and a lien was expressly reserved upon the land for the payment of the notes. Subsequently…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Perrill & Fox v. RungeTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Ayers v. . DixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Lappen v. GillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  4. Risk v. HoffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Mead v. Johnson Group, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Gulf Paving Co. v. LofstedtTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Talley v. HowsleyTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Talley v. HowsleyTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Hill v. PrestonTexas Supreme Court · 1931

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API