Therrell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WOODLEY, .Judge.
The appeal is from a conviction for aggravated assault; the punishment, two yéars in j ail.
The record contains no recognizance or bond on appeal, and there is no" showing that appellant is confined in jail.
A notation from the court’s docket suggesting that a recognizance may have been entered into is not sufficient. Steele v. State, 94 Tex.Cr.R. 345, 251 S.W. 222.
In the absence of a bond or recognizance substantially in the form prescribed by Art. 831, C.C.P.,. and -there being no showing that the defendant is confined in jail, we are without jurisdiction to enter any order…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Steele v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Skinner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Steele v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
3Cited by10 opinions
- Reid v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Choice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Therrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Baird v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Baird v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.