Legal Opinion

Choice v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 6, 1957No. 28513PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODLEY, Judge.

The offense is the possession of whisky in a dry area for the purpose of sale; the punishment, one year.

The record contains no recognizance or appeal bond and shows that appellant has been enlarged pending the appeal.

The minutes of the court which appear in the transcript, suggesting that recognizance may have been entered into, are not sufficient. Bell v. State, 137 Tex.Cr.R. 128, 128 S.W.2d 812; Therrell v. State, 161 Tex.Cr.R. 617, 279 S.W.2d 879; and Reid v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 289 S.W.2d 237.

In the absence of a recognizance or bond substantially in the form prescribed by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reid v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  2. Therrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kucha v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. Ex parte SteelCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Ex parte SteelCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API