Legal Opinion

Baird v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 11, 1956No. 27843Published

1Opinion

ON appellant’s motion for rehearing

WOODLEY, Judge.

*592Appellant complains of the original opinion both because he construes its language as a reprimand of appellant’s counsel and as depriving him of the statutory right to 90 days’ time in which to file a statement of facts.

We disclaim any intent to reprimand counsel, but remain convinced that appellant is not entitled to a reversal of his conviction upon the ground that he was deprived of a statement of facts because he has not shown due diligence on the part of himself and his counsel to secure same. We also remain convinced that the statement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
  2. Therrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Widener v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API