Legal Opinion

Steele v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 8, 1922No. 6612PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHawkins, J.

Conviction is for vagrancy with punishment fixed at $100 fine.

The transcript before us totally fails to set out a recognizance. The only reference thereto is made immediately 'following the order overruling the motion for new trial, and is in these words:

“Recognizance of defendant entered into in the sum of $300 with W. P. Steele as principal and W. L. Hurst and B. O. McGee as sureties.”

We are unable to tell from the transcript whether this is a part of the order, or simply a notation by the clerk who prepared the transcript. Article 918, C. C. P., provides:

“When the defendant appeals in any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Neyland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. McIntosh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Ellis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Therrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
  2. Etchieson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. Therrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Therrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API