Harmon v. De Turk
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Prank G. Pinlayson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The purpose of this action was to obtain an injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff in the free use and occupancy of .a tract of land in' the county of Los Angeles. The complaint alleged that on May 2, 1914, the defendant J. G. De Turk was the owner of said land; that on that day he executed and delivered to the plaintiff a written lease of said land for the term of one year, with the privilege of renewals. By said writing the lessee was given the exclusive right of excavating, grading, and removing sand, rock, and gravel from said land, subject to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moore v. Clear Lake Water WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Mendelson v. McCabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Mechs' Foundry of San Francisco v. RyallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Caifornia Navigation Co. v. Union Transportation Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Randall v. FreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by13 opinions
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Childers v. ChildersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Jeffers v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Kendis v. CohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Steiner v. DarbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.