Legal Opinion

Stare v. Pearcy

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 4, 1980No. Nos. 75-2331, 78-1033PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge:

Giving West Virginia’s “savings statute” permitting the commencement of a new action after dismissal of a previous action without resolution of the merits a narrow reading, the district judge dismissed this action on the ground that West Virginia’s two-year statute of limitations had run before the action’s commencement. We think the savings statute should receive a broader construction and reverse.

The plaintiffs, husband and wife and citizens of Ohio, received personal injuries when their automobile was involved in a collision in West Virginia with an automobile being…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ketterman v. Dry Fork Railroad Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Tompkins v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Arbenz v. Exley, Watkins & Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Ware v. WatermanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Morris v. WiseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gurfein v. Sovereign GroupDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Enid Allen v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Clarice King v. Nashua Corporation and H.S. CrockerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Long Island Trust Co. v. DickerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API