Legal Opinion
Ware v. Waterman
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 1969No. 1168A194PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
Appellant-plaintiff appeals here from a summary judgment entered below in favor of the appellee-defend-ant. Said judgment was as follows:
“Court having taken matter under advisement now sustains Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the Plaintiff take nothing by his complaint. Costs taxed to the plaintiff.”
Appellant assigns as error that:
“1. The Court erred in sustaining Appellee’s Motion For Summary Judgment.
“2. The Court erred in failing to give its reasons for sustaining Appellee’s Motion For Summary Judgment.”
By reason of our decision concerning…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harris v. Young Women's Christian Assn. of Terre HauteIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
- Evans v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Pennsylvania Co. v. GoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
- Abele v. A. L. Dougherty Overseas, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1961
- Jackson v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Middelkamp v. HanewichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Vesolowski Ex Rel. Vesolowski v. RepayIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
- Martin v. LevinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Ferdinand Furn. Co., Inc. v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Lows v. WarfieldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.