Legal Opinion

Moosebrugger v. Prospect Presbyterian Church

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 27, 1953PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Oliphant, J.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. Petitioner was the sexton of the Prospect Presbyterian Church of Maplewood in that borough. As such sexton he worked regularly, except for his weekly day off, from 8:30 A. M. to 5 :30 p. M., and in the evenings when church services, meetings and other activities were held. The stipulation of facts *214shows that these, were held on many weekday nights and that the meeting held on the night of petitioner’s accident, November 10, 1948, was one which had been planned and scheduled well in advance and notice…

2Cited by23 opinions

  1. Histed v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  2. Hornyak v. the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  3. Hebrank v. ParsonsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  4. Meo v. Commercial Can Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  5. Pearce v. NJ Highway AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API