Moosebrugger v. Prospect Presbyterian Church
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Oliphant, J.
This is a workmen’s compensation case. Petitioner was the sexton of the Prospect Presbyterian Church of Maplewood in that borough. As such sexton he worked regularly, except for his weekly day off, from 8:30 A. M. to 5 :30 p. M., and in the evenings when church services, meetings and other activities were held. The stipulation of facts *214shows that these, were held on many weekday nights and that the meeting held on the night of petitioner’s accident, November 10, 1948, was one which had been planned and scheduled well in advance and notice…
2Cited by23 opinions
- Histed v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Hornyak v. the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Hebrank v. ParsonsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Meo v. Commercial Can Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Pearce v. NJ Highway AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.