Legal Opinion
Meo v. Commercial Can Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 3, 1963PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
80 N.J. Super. 58 (1963)
192 A.2d 854
FELIX MEO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
COMMERCIAL CAN CORP., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 10, 1963.
Decided July 3, 1963.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and FOLEY.
Mr. Frank Fink argued the cause for appellant (Mr. James J. Carroll, attorney).
Mr. Herman M. Wilson argued the cause for respondent (Mr. David B. Geltzeiler, attorney; Mr. Wilson, on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.
This is an appeal from a County Court judgment affirming a Workmen's Compensation Division award in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Claim of Field v. Charmette Knitted Fabric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Tocci v. Tessler & Weiss, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Gullo v. American Lead Pencil Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bearshield v. City of GregorySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Cremen v. Harrah's Marina Hotel CasinoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Daniello v. MacHise Express Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Salierno v. Micro Stamping Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Barnes v. PanaroSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.