Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance v. Stinebaugh

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 12, 2003No. 81, September Term, 2002PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATTAGLIA, Judge.

In this appeal from the denial of a motion to compel arbitration, we must decide two issues. First, whether it is for courts, or for arbitrators, to determine if a particular dispute is for the courts or arbitrators to decide when parties enter into a general arbitration agreement, but subsequently bind themselves to a Consent Order that contemplates judicial resolution of a particular controversy. Second, what is the legal effect of an agreement that contemplates judicial resolution of a particular dispute, upon a prior, general arbitration agreement. As to the first issue,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Clark v. ElzaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Gold Coast Mall, Inc. v. Larmar Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Crown Oil and Wax Co. of Delaware, Inc. v. Glen Construction Co. of Virginia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Holmes v. Coverall North America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Charles J. Frank, Inc. v. Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Walther v. Sovereign BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Cheek v. United Healthcare of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Holloman v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Rourke v. Amchem Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Sadler v. Dimensions Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API