Legal Opinion

Gould v. Bangor and Aroostook Railroad Company

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 6, 1972PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBBER, Justice.

These two cases, tried together, resulted in jury verdicts for the two plaintiffs. The cases arise from a crossing accident in which a cement truck owned by Trombly Construction Company and operated by Trombly’s employee Gould was in collision with a train operated by defendant Railroad. Applying the doctrine of comparative negligence, the jury reduced a verdict of $20,000 for Gould for his personal injuries by $8,000 but reduced a verdict of $8,000 for Trombly for its property damage by only $3,000. Since the negligence attributable to both plaintiffs is necessarily…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  3. Hinds v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1959
  4. Johnson v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Witherly v. Bangor & Aroostook RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wing v. MorseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  2. Pelkey v. Canadian Pacific Ltd.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  3. Victor Sunshine v. Stephen M. BrettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  4. Irving Pulp & Paper Ltd. v. KellySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  5. Paula Bratton v. Halsey McDonoughSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API