Legal Opinion

Witherly v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 8, 1932PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dunn,-J.

Action by an automobilist to recover for personal injuries, and for damage to his car, from a grade crossing collision with a freight car. A verdict was ordered for the defendant. The plaintiff saved an exception.

On October 31,1929, about 11.30 o’clock, p.m., the night being dark but clear, plaintiff drove his automobile against an empty flat car, standing motionless across a highway, as part of a train.

The accident occurred at Dyer Brook, in proximity to the station and switching yards of the defendant.

Plaintiff alleged the defendant actionably negligent in failing to provide…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . the Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. DillonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1921
  4. Gilman v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  5. Wilds v. . the Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Squyres v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  2. Crosby v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Southern Ry. Co. v. LambertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Richard v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
  5. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. CogburnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API