McCord, Brady & Co. v. Hamel
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Scott, J.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
This was replevin by Cus Hamel against Gustave Pegau to recover possession of a stock of groceries. The latter claimed possession under a chattel mortgage, while plaintiff asserted title by purchase from one John E. Nelson. McCord, Brady & Co., Consolidated Tank Line Company, and Consolidated Coffee Company intervened in the action and set up that they were creditors; that they severally commenced attachment proceedings, and garnished Pegau while he was yet in possession of the property, and that the transfer from Nelson to Hamel was fraudulent and void. Issues were joined, and upon the trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ætna Insurance v. SimmonsNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Johnson v. GulickNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Glaze v. ParcelNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Denise v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. GerholdNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bradley v. SlaterNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- National Masonic Accident Ass'n v. BurrNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Hart v. WeberNebraska Supreme Court · 1899