Legal Opinion

Bartley v. Fraser

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 6, 1911No. Civ. No. 823PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco changing the place of trial of an action. Geo. A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order of the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, transferring the above-entitled action to the superior court of Mariposa county for trial.

The plaintiffs’ complaint alleges substantially the following facts:

In the month of April, 1909, the defendant P. W. Fraser offered to sell to the plaintiffs an undivided one-half interest in certain mining claims and water rights situate in Mariposa county, California. In the month of May following, the plaintiffs, relying upon certain representations of defendant Fraser, purchased an undivided one-half…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Cannon v. HandleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. HyattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. McKenzie v. BarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Sayward v. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shreeves v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Early v. OwensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. South v. County of San BenitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Cohen v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Banbury v. BrailsfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API