State ex rel. Savage v. Letton
Nebraska Supreme Court
Original application for mandamus. The facts are stated in the opinion. References: State, v. Hunter, 27 Pac. Rep. [Wash.] 1076; Whaley v. King, 28 Pac. Rep. [Gal.] 579; State v. McClinton, 48 Pac. Rep. [Wash.] 740; State v. Engle, 127 Ind. 457; Ex parte Charleston, 18 So.
Read the full summary
Original application for mandamus. The facts are stated in the opinion. References: State, v. Hunter, 27 Pac. Rep. [Wash.] 1076; Whaley v. King, 28 Pac. Rep. [Gal.] 579; State v. McClinton, 48 Pac. Rep. [Wash.] 740; State v. Engle, 127 Ind. 457; Ex parte Charleston, 18 So. Rep. [Ala,] 224; Brotan v. Mesnard Mining Co., 63 N. W. Rep. [Mich.] 1000; People v. Staift, 59 Mich. 529; Illinois C. R. Co. v. People, 143 111. 434; State v. Scott, 53 Neb. 571; Garber v. Palmer, 47 Neb. 699; Bolin v. Fines, 51 Neb. 650; Bartels v. Sonnenschein, 54 Neb. 68; State v. Tarpen, 1 N. E. Rep. [O.] 215; State v.…
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, C. J.
In .an action of replevin, commenced in the county court of Gage county, the property was taken under the writ and delivered to the plaintiff. Issues were joined, a trial had, and judgment rendered, from which an appeal was perfected to the .district court; and during the course of the proceedings in the appellate court a motion was presented for defendants that the writ be quashed, the action dismissed, and a jury impaneled to inquire of defendants’ right of property, possession, and damages, on the ground that the petition and affidavit filed in the court where the suit was instituted were…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moore v. HerronNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- Gray v. DeanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Campbell v. CroneNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
- Parsell v. Genesee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pennington County Bank v. BaumanNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
- Reid, Murdoch & Co. v. PanskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Tiedtke v. WhalenNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
- Pennington County Bank v. BaumanNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
- Ware v. Shoemaker-Bale Auto Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928