Legal Opinion

Gray v. Dean

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 30, 1883PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevens, J.

This is an action of replevin. The value of the replevied property, as appeared by the agreement of parties, did not exceed "one hundred dollars, and the Superior Court had therefore no jurisdiction of the action. Leonard v. Hannon, 105 Mass. 113. Octo v. Teahan, 133 Mass. 430. The action having been dismissed for that reason, the defendant moved for an order for the return of the property, which was granted; and the question is here presented whether the Superior Court had authority to make this order.

In Jordan v. Dennis, 7 Met. 590, which was a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gray v. ThrasherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Leonard v. HannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. McInerny v. SamuelsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  4. Octo v. TeahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Donnelly v. MontagueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Hathaway Bakeries, Inc. v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. New England Home for Deaf Mutes v. Leader Filling Stations Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Carroll v. BergerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. In Re Estate of PalmieriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API