Legal Opinion

DiGrazia v. Old

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided July 6, 1995No. 06-95-00015-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLEIL, Justice.

This is a summary judgment case involving a suit by Joseph and Thomas DiGrazia to recover damages for the death of their racehorse. The trial court found that the statute of limitations barred the DiGrazias’ claims and granted the defendants’ motions for summary judgment. On appeal, the DiGrazi-as contend that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because the summary judgment evidence raises a fact question about whether the defendants fraudulently concealed the existence of a cause of action and thus tolled the statute of limitations. We affirm the judgment…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Brownlee v. BrownleeTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Roark v. STALLWORTH OIL AND GAS, INCTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Borderlon v. PeckTexas Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mitchell Energy Corp. v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. John Priester, Jr. v. JP Morgan Chase BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  3. Houston Endowment, Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  4. Sauceda v. Kerlin, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
  5. Hay v. Shell Oil Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API