Mitchell Energy Corp. v. Bartlett
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRIGHAM, Justice.
In this ease concerning alleged permanent injury to land, the primary issues we must determine are whether appellees 1 timely filed their lawsuits against appellant Mitchell Energy Corporation (Mitchell) and whether the evidence establishes that Mitchell caused appellees’ alleged injuries. We hold that most of appellees’ claims are time-barred and that there is no evidence of causation. Consequently, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and render judgment that appellees take nothing from Mitchell.
I. Background Facts and Procedural History.
Appellees are all landowners…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Catalina v. BlasdelTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by135 opinions
- HECI Exploration Co. v. NeelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Everett v. TK-Taito, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Glover v. Union Pacific Railroad, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
- Martinez v. City of San Antonio, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.