Legal Opinion
City of New Bedford v. New Bedford, Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & Nantucket Steamship Authority
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 15, 1958PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHonan, J.
These are exceptions taken by the respondents comprising a public board created by St. 1948, c. 544, and known as New Bedford, Woods Hole, Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority, three of its individual members, and three intervening banks who are owners of bonds issued by the board, to an order for judgment entered upon this petition for a writ of mandamus commanding the board and its five individual members “to comply with the provisions of c. 747 of the Statutes of 1956 by taking such steps as may be reasonable and necessary to carry out the intent and purposes of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Veix v. Sixth Ward Building & Loan Assn. of NewarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Commonwealth v. WeloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Bowe v. Secretary of CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dodge v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Commissioner of Labor & Industries v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
- Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & Nantucket Steamship Authority v. Martha's Vineyard CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Opinions of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Town of Barnstable v. Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & Nantucket Steamship AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.