Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Boll

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1998No. 97 CA 41PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kline, Judge.

Stacey L. Boll appeals from a Lawrence County Probate Court’s judgment that granted executor Janis Boll Compton’s motion to dismiss Stacey’s exceptions to the executor’s final account because Stacey did not have standing to invoke the jurisdiction of the court. 1 On appeal, Stacey contends that the trial court inappropriately granted the executor’s motion to dismiss based on Ollick v. Rice (1984), 16 Ohio App.3d 448, 16 OBR 529, 476 N.E.2d 1062, which interprets R.C. 2109.33. We agree. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand this case to that court for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. White v. JunkinOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Enyart v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Ollick v. RiceOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. In re First National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bazo v. SiegelOhio Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Estate of AbraitisOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. In re Estate of AbraitisOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. In re Estate of CornellOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. In re Estate of SudmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API