Legal Opinion

State ex rel. White v. Junkin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1997No. 97-202PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

In order to determine whether a writ of prohibition is warranted in this case, we must decide whether a ruling written on a case file jacket and posted on the computerized court docket is a final judgment. Because we find that it is not, we reverse the court of appeals and deny the writ.

A writ of prohibition is an extraordinary writ that is not routinely or easily granted. State ex rel. Barclays Bank PLC v. Hamilton Cty. Court of Common Pleas (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 536, 660 N.E.2d 458. In order to be entitled to a writ of prohibition, a relator must establish that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hansen v. ReedOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State ex rel. Enyart v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Barclays Bank PLC v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Hanley v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State ex rel. Fraternal Order of Police, Ohio Labor Council, Inc. v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cruzado v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. Henderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. RaberOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. Bates (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. CarlisleOhio Supreme Court · 2011

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API