Legal Opinion

In re First National Bank

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1974No. 73-370PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

Appellant’s propositions of law, as presented here, are (1) that the trustee of a testamentary trust owes to trust beneficiaries a duty to collect and preserve the assets of the trust estate, and (2) that the beneficiary of a testamentary trust is not barred from asserting a claim against the trustee to redress a breach of the trustee’s duties by failure on the part of the beneficiary to assert a claim against the executor.

As noted in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, appellant did not file exceptions to the final account of the executor, First National Bank. The question, then, is whether…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dickerson v. Camden Trust CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dayton Title Agency, Inc. v. White Family Companies, Inc. (In Re Dayton Title Agency, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
  2. Liska v. First National Bank in Sioux CityCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1981
  3. Pepper v. Zions First National Bank, N.A.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Matter of Irrevocable Inter Vivos Trust, Etc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Bullis v. DuPage Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API