Rothenberg v. H. Rothstein & Sons
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
On this appeal, the parties have presented two issues for determination; (1) whether the defendants properly raised their defense based on the Statute of Frauds contained in the Pennsylvania Sales Act, 69 P.S. § 42, and (2) whether the learned trial judge erred in holding that the contract involved was outside the statute. However, on examination, the record discloses another, and more important, issue which, because it was not here developed hy the parties, warrants the granting of an opportunity for them to do so.
Rothenberg commenced this litigation by complaint to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Linn v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Rothenberg v. H. Rothstein & SonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Joseph v. Krull Wholesale Drug Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. AllenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- Renault v. L. N. Renault & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.