Legal Opinion

Sturgis v. Baker

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Umatilla : William R. Ellis, Judge. Action by Lina H. Sturgis against William Baker. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bean

delivered.the opinion.

This is an action on a promissory note, and comes here on appeal from a judgment of involuntary nonsuit. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is the owner and holder of the note, and that it has not been paid. The answer denies the allegations of ownership and nonpayment, and affirmatively alleges that defendant paid the note in full on December 13,1894, to plaintiff’s intestate, S. P. Sturgis, who then claimed to have it in his possession. The admissions in the pleadings and the evidence introduced by the plaintiff tend to show that on December 8,1893, the defendant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dodge v. Freedman's Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Rouse v. . WhitedNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  3. Swope v. LeffingwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  4. Bearss v. . CopleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  5. Chambers v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Inter Maritime Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. Inter Maritime Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API