Rouse v. . Whited
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The only important question presented by this appeal is: Had the defendants a right to prove on the cross-examination that when Oliver Whited told the sheriff and both defendants told Seaman that the property levied on was the plaintiff's, they at the same time and as part of the same conversation said that the debt (the execution debt) was the plaintiff's debt or belonged to him to pay? It appears that the County Court reversed the judgment of the justice…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mumford v. WhitneyNew York Supreme Court · 1836
- Griffith v. ReedNew York Supreme Court · 1839
- Forrest v. ForrestThe Superior Court of New York City · 1856
- Garey v. NicholsonNew York Supreme Court · 1840
- Dorlon v. DouglassNew York Supreme Court · 1849
3Cited by31 opinions
- Platner v. . PlatnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Grattan v. . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Jeddeloh v. HockenhullSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- People of the State of New York v. . BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Merchants' Loan & Trust Co. v. EganIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.