Inter Maritime Forwarding Co. v. United States

DISSENTING OPINION

Mollison, Judge:

I am compelled to dissent from the conclusions of the majority. To begin with, I believe that the plaintiff was prevented from offering relevant and material evidence bearing on the determination of the quota for woolen fabrics and the proof of its claim. Even in an administrative proceeding, to say nothing of a judicial proceeding such as this one, where testimony is taken, a party must not be prevented from offering relevant and material testimony and evidence ;1 nor must relevant and material evidence be suppressed.2

By stipulation, the parties agreed that…