Inter Maritime Forwarding Co. v. United States

DISSENTING OPINION

Mollison, Judge:

I disagree with my colleagues in denying admission into evidence of plaintiff’s exhibits 6, 7, and 8 for identification.

Exhibit 6 for identification concerns production statistics used in the determination of the 1956 tariff quota on wool fabrics provided for in paragraphs 1108 and 1109(a). Said exhibit 6 for identification is a photostatic copy of the original issued by the Committee for Reciprocity Information and has attached thereto Table 1 — United States Production of the Types of Woven Wool Fabrics that would be dutiable, if imported, under tariff…