Legal Opinion

Carstens v. Lamm

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided January 28, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-F-1713, 81-F-1870PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHERMAN G. FINESILVER, District Judge:

In these consolidated cases, the Court is called upon to select a congressional redistricting plan for the State of Colorado. Following the tabulation of the 1980 decennial census, the Clerk of the United States House of Representatives informed the Governor of Colorado that the state, which currently has five representatives in Congress, was entitled to an additional congressional seat. Although the Governor and the General Assembly (sometimes referred to as the “State Legislature”) made repeated attempts to develop an…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Karcher v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Perry v. Del RioTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Branch v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Gingles v. EdmistenDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1984
  5. Hastert v. State Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API