Legal Opinion
Newport Electric Corporation v. Federal Power Com'n
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 13, 1938PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The respondent, the Federal Power Commission, moves to dismiss a petition to review one of its orders on the ground that the proceeding is not within our jurisdiction. The petitioner, Newport Electric Corporation, is a Vermont corporation doing business in Newport, and the other petitioner, Citizens Utilities Company, is a Delaware corporation with its chief office in Minneapolis. They filed a joint application with the Commission in which the Newport Company asked leave to merge with the Citizens Utilities Company; the Commission granted a hearing and took written and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. CorrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Powell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Mallory Coal Co. v. National Bituminous Coal CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Utah Fuel Co. v. National Bituminous Coal CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Pacific Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Pacific Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.