Legal Opinion

Pacific Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power Commission

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 6, 1938No. 8803PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is a motion to dismiss the power and light companies’ petition to review an order of the Federal Power Commission denying them the right to transfer all the property, rights, licenses and assets of Inland Power & Light Company to Pacific Power '& Light Company.

The petitioners pray for our order (1) setting aside the order of the Commission and (2) directing the Commission to make and enter an appropriate order granting’the authority for and approval of the transfer.

The petitioners had applied to the Commission for the order, hearing was had, evidence adduced and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. Los Angeles & Salt Lake RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. United States v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Procter & Gamble Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Intermountain Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Cities Service Gas Company, a Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Magnolia Petroleum Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  3. State of Washington Department of Game v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  4. Pacific Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API