Legal Opinion

United States v. Corrick

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 18, 1936No. 656PublishedCited by 251 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts

This is an appeal from a decree of a specially constituted district court awarding an interlocutory injunction against the Secretary of Agriculture and others restraining them from prosecuting the appellees, operators of market agencies at the Chicago stockyards, for violation of the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921.

The appellees are, for the most part, the same .persons and corporations as the appellants in No. 655, Acker v. United States, ante, p. 426. While that case was pending on appeal to this court, and the rates therein prescribed by order of the Secretary of Agriculture were…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MaurerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Morris v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Stratton v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by251 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

246 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API