Legal Opinion

Cox v. Cox

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1947No. Civ. 13525PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action to quiet his title against the claims of defendant, his wife, to the sum of $16,797.13 on deposit with defendant title company, he claiming the money as his separate property. Defendant wife denied that plaintiff was the sole owner of the money, alleged that each owned an undivided interest in the fund, and by cross-complaint prayed for an equal partition of the joint tenancy fund. The trial court determined that the parties owned the money as joint tenants and that each was entitled to one-half thereof. From a judgment predicated upon this finding plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Chamberlain v. ChamberlainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Olson v. OlsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Hughes v. GrandyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Thomasset v. ThomassetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Schindler v. SchindlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. King v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Trimble v. St. Joseph's HospitalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API