Legal Opinion
King v. King
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 5, 1951No. Civ. 18369PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.
Preshaw Duke King and Grace Haynes King, husband and wife, acquired a home as joint tenants using community funds for its payment. About the same time, husband borrowed $5,000 on his personal note from his sister, Aura King. Then husband died and his wife qualified as executrix of Ms estate, the assets of which were less than the amount, of the note. Aura King presented her claim in the estate and it was disallowed by executrix.
By this action said sister sought a judgment against the estate for the amount of the note, plus interest and attorney’s fees; and also “that the property held in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Siberell v. SiberellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Rauer's Collection Co. v. HigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Young v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Estate of ZaringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Schindler v. SchindlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. NogarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Trimble v. St. Joseph's HospitalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- Jones v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Edwards v. DeitrichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.