Legal Opinion

United States v. James Caravayo

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 4, 2016No. 14-50773PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Per curiam

The district court imposed a blanket supervised release condition that bars Defendant James Allen Caravayo — who was originally convicted of possessing child pornography — from dating any adult with minor children. Caravayo challenges the dating restriction, arguing that it violates 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d) and his First Amendment right of free association. Because the dating restriction was not supported by a factual finding or otherwise clearly substantiated by the record, we VACATE the sentence and REMAND for resentenc-ing.

*272I.

In November 2005, Caravayo pleaded guilty to possession of child…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. Ronald Scott PaulCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. Seymore v. Shawver & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Frank Lafayette BirdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. Benjamin McMillerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Paul SuarezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. John CabelloCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Chanda HuorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Maria AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API