Legal Opinion

Malinoski v. Kessler

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 1937No. Appeal, 24PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

The question presented in this workmen’s compensation case is whether Joseph Malinoski was accidentally killed while in the course of his employment.

The referee concluded that deceased “was fatally injured on July 16, 1934, while in the course of his employment for defendant.” He awarded compensation to his widow and her children. On appeal by the insurance carrier, the workmen’s compensation board affirmed the referee. An appeal was taken to the court of common pleas, which affirmed the board. This appeal followed.

Joseph Malinoski was employed by defendant, F. D.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Palko v. Taylor-Mccoy C. C. Co. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Knorr v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Cronin v. American Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Dunn v. TregoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hockenberry v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Kattera v. Burrell Construction & Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API