Legal Opinion

Hockenberry v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1938No. Appeal, 2PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

The only question involved in this workmen’s compensation case is whether, at the time he was fatally injured, claimant’s husband was in the course of his employment with defendant employer.

After three hearings the referee disallowed compensation, and claimant appealed to the Workmen’s Compensation Board, which remanded the case for the taking of additional testimony. Pursuant to that order the referee held two more, hearings, and republished his original findings of fact, conclusions of law, and disallowed compensation. Upon appeal the Workmen’s Compensation Board…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Palko v. Taylor-Mccoy C. C. Co. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Cronin v. American Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Healey v. Hudson Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. McDermott v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New YorkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Harmon v. KnollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Lambing v. Consolidation Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Oakes v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Lemmon v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Fanning v. Apawana Golf ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Manikowski v. Morris Run Coal Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API