Legal Opinion

Circle K Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 9, 1993No. 1 CA-IC 92-0159PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOREMAN, Judge. *

Circle K Corporation (“Circle K”) filed this special action to challenge the award of the Arizona Industrial Commission reopening a 1987 industrial injury claim brought by La Donna Sharp (“Sharp”), its employee. Circle K has argued that reopening the claim is precluded because Sharp allowed the denial of a prior petition to reopen to become final. We conclude that neither claim preclusion nor issue preclusion prevents the reopening of this claim and, therefore, affirm the award and decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”).

I. Factual and Procedural History

Sharp…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chaney Building Co. v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Stainless Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Ferris v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. Bill Breck Dodge, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Matusik v. Arizona Public Service Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Northern States Power Co. v. BugherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Lovitch v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. Airfreight Express Ltd. v. Evergreen Air Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Hall v. LalliArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Cridland v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API