Legal Opinion

Toomer v. City Cab

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 4, 2006No. 05-4091PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Barbara Toomer and the Disabled Rights Action Committee (collectively, “DRAC”) appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees City Cab Company, Inc., Ute Cab Company, Inc., and Yellow Cab Drivers Association Inc. (collectively, “Cab Companies”), arising from DRAC’s claim that the Cab Companies operated in violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189. DRAC sought to require the Cab Companies to provide service to powered wheelchair users, contending that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Fish v. KobachCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. LamirandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. Navajo Nation v. DalleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. SprengerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  5. Hackwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API