Legal Opinion
Hackwell v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 5, 2007No. 05-1509PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants Kim Hackwell and Killian, Guthro & Jensen, P.C. (KGJ) filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado challenging a regulation, 28 C.F.R. § 79.74(b), that interprets the attorney-fee limitations set forth by the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2210 note Sec. 9. The district court granted the Defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Dist. Ct. Order at 24. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and reverse and remand for proceedings…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sutton v. Utah State School for the Deaf & BlindCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- John A. Mitchell v. Bruce King, Governor of the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Larry BegayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Edgar Jamal GamoryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Nino v. JEWELRY EXCHANGE, INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- United States v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BurkholderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.