Blinkoff v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The plaintiff, Holly Blinkoff, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing her administrative appeal from a decision of the defendant, the state commission on human rights and opportunities (commission). The commission determined that the defendants, the city of Torrington (city) and city planner Dana McGuinness, had retaliated against the plaintiff but that she failed to prove that she had incurred compensable damages as a result. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) failed to consider certain statements and documents in its review…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- City of Groton v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Rossman v. MorascoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Eagen v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Benjamin v. Dept. of Developmental ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Blinkoff v. TorringtonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Echo Hose AmbulanceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- Lucarelli v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012