Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Lowe
District Court, D. Utah
Decided February 26, 1992No. Civ. 90-C-388WPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
WINDER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), in its capacity as receiver for Heritage Bank and Trust (“Heritage”), and defendants John W. Lowe and John W. Lowe and R. Clark Arnold, formerly doing business as Lowe & Arnold (“Lowe” or “Lowe defendants”), and R. Clark Arnold submitted memoranda in this matter, which was argued orally on January 30, 1992. Mark E. Friedman,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Jack H. Harrison and Frederick G. RixeyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. BurdetteDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1989
- FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION v. CarlsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. BakerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. NibloDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1993
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. ScalettyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. FarmerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. HeisermanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. FleischerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.