Legal Opinion
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION v. Carlson
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 31, 1988No. Civ. 6-88-157PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVITT, District Judge.
Currently pending is the plaintiff’s motion to strike the defendant’s affirmative defense of contributory negligence and the statute of limitations. Based on the submitted memoranda and oral argument of counsel, the court finds as follows:
Background
This action brought by the FDIC alleges that the former officers and directors of The Chokio State Bank were negligent in the performance of their duties. The Chok-io State Bank was closed in 1986 and the FDIC was appointed as receiver. As receiver, the FDIC sold the Bank’s claims against its officers and directors to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- First State Bank of Hudson County v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
- Fabrica Italiana Lavorazione Materie Organiche, S. A. S. v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. BerryDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Receiver of Texas Investment Bank v. Rockleigh S. Dawson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Hecht v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. HowseDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1990
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Former Officers And Directors Of Metropolitan BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. IshamDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1992
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.