Legal Opinion
Ottman v. Barnhart
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided March 3, 2004No. 2:03-cv-00217PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ALLEN SHARP, District Judge.
This is an action for judicial review of Defendant’s final decision that Plaintiff, Leletta Ottman, (“Ms. Ottman”) was not entitled to a period of disability and Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act, as amended. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i), 423(d). Ms. Ottman filed her application for benefits on July 13, 1999, alleging that she had been unable to work since March 16, 1999, due to back and hand pain, headaches, blurred vision, and her “nerves” (Tr. 63-65, 359). After the agency denied her application…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Donna J. Clifford v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Joseph A. Zurawski v. William A. Halter, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, .Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Douglas GARNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Hattie Dixon v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Washington v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2010
- Jones v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020