Legal Opinion

Big Four Implement Co. v. Keyser

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 11, 1916No. 19,958PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Clay district court; Sam Kimble, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This was an action by creditors to subject a fund to which they had contributed to the payment of their claims.

J. F. Keyser and his sons, W. D. and W. O. Keyser, were engaged in the hardware business at Wakefield. On July 22, 1911, J. F. Keyser died, leaving as his only heirs his widow, Maggie Keyser, the two sons mentioned, and two daughters who had not yet reached majority. On August 5, 1911, the widow was appointed administratrix of the estate, and on August 28, 1911, W. D. Keyser qualified as surviving partner, giving bond with G.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Didlake v. Roden Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Central Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. RespassCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  4. Frey v. EisenhardtMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Martin v. DialTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  2. State Bank of Wheatland v. Bagley Bros.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Burris v. BurrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. In Re McMillan's EstateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Watumull v. EttingerHawaii Supreme Court · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API