Legal Opinion

Dubbs v. Haworth

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1918No. 21,063PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Jewell district court; Richard M. Pickler, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by-

Dawson, J.:

W. W. Dubbs and A. L. Dubbs, husband and wife, filed in the probate court a claim against the estate of Tacy Campbell for services rendered by them to the latter in her lifetime, at her instance and request. This claim was only verified by Dubbs, the husband, and it was disallowed by the probate court on the ground—

“That the evidence is insufficient to constitute an oral contract between said claimants and said deceased.”

The claimants appealed to the district court, where they prevailed. The jury made special findings of fact:

“Question…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heery v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  2. Emery v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Aiken v. NogleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  4. Blair v. McQuarySupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Minor v. LillardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. Bateman v. FranklinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Dent v. MortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Burris v. BurrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Johnson v. LanderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API